wikipedia is history

At least to me. I was a fan, and probably will remain one, but i think this, free for all, concept is not really free for all, and is fraught with chaos and bias.

I recently encountered some difficulties in correcting a perception or bias of a story. I will go back and try again, but given my schedule i dont know if have the time to persist and fight all the dissenting views. Well it also means that the history i read is not exactly suiting my taste. So who is wrong? Wikipedia or me?